ISO 21434 速查表

一頁速覽全標準。每個小節結尾以 → [[筆記連結]] 指向深度筆記。


一、標準骨架 (15 個 Clauses + Annex)

Clause 中文名稱 內容焦點
1–3 範圍、參考、術語 定義、術語、標準範圍
4 General considerations 通用考量、依據與目的
5 Organizational cybersecurity management CSMS、文化、能力、稽核
6 Project-dependent cybersecurity management CS Plan、Tailoring、Case
7 Distributed cybersecurity activities CIA、供應商管理
8 Continual cybersecurity activities 監控、事件評估、弱點管理
9 Concept Item 定義、CS Goal、CS Claim、CS Concept
10 Product development 設計、整合、驗證、弱點分析
11 Cybersecurity validation 車輛層級驗證 (含滲透測試)
12 Production 生產資安控制、Provisioning
13 Operations and maintenance 事件回應、更新(含 OTA)
14 End of cybersecurity support and decommissioning EoS、除役
15 Threat analysis and risk assessment methods TARA 八步驟方法
Annex A–H 範例、CAL 表、攻擊可行性參數 工具與表格

01-Foundations/01-Standard-Overview


二、TARA 八步驟(Clause 15)

1. Asset Identification         → 資產識別
2. Threat Scenario Identification → 威脅情境識別
3. Impact Rating                → 衝擊評等 (SFOP)
4. Attack Path Analysis         → 攻擊路徑分析
5. Attack Feasibility Rating    → 攻擊可行性評等
6. Risk Value Determination     → 風險值判定
7. Risk Treatment Decision      → 風險處置決策
8. (持續監控與更新)

12-TARA-Methods/01-TARA-Overview


三、SFOP 衝擊類別

簡寫 名稱 範例
S Safety 安全 致命/重傷、人員受傷
F Financial 財務 召回成本、車輛價值損失
O Operational 營運 功能無法使用、效能降級
P Privacy 隱私 PII 洩漏、車主行為被追蹤

四個等級:Negligible → Moderate → Major → Severe

12-TARA-Methods/04-Impact-Rating


四、Attack Feasibility 五大參數(Annex G)

Attack Potential 方法(最常考),其他兩種方法:CVSS、Attack Vector。

參數 0 分 (容易) ~ 高分 (困難)
Elapsed Time 流逝時間 < 1 day (0) > 6 months (19)
Specialist Expertise 專家能力 Layman (0) Multiple Experts (8)
Knowledge of Item 標的知識 Public (0) Strictly confidential (11)
Window of Opportunity 機會窗口 Unlimited (0) None (∞ ≈ infeasible)
Equipment 設備 Standard (0) Multiple bespoke (9)

總分對應易混淆考點:分數越 = 可行性越):

Total Score Attack Feasibility
0–13 High (容易)
14–19 Medium
20–24 Low
≥ 25 Very Low

12-TARA-Methods/06-Attack-Feasibility-Rating


五、風險值矩陣 (Risk Matrix)

              Attack Feasibility →
Impact ↓     Very Low   Low    Med    High
Severe         2         3      4      5
Major          1         2      3      4
Moderate       1         1      2      3
Negligible     1         1      1      2

風險值 1–5(或 1–25 等變體,視組織定義)。

12-TARA-Methods/07-Risk-Determination


六、風險處置 4 種選項

選項 含意 範例
Avoid 避免 移除功能/設計變更 不提供遠端解鎖
Reduce 降低 加入資安控制 加入訊息驗證 (SecOC)
Share/Transfer 轉移 保險、供應商承擔 委由 Tier-1 處理 + 合約
Retain 保留 接受殘餘風險 + 文件化 殘餘風險紀錄與監控

12-TARA-Methods/08-Risk-Treatment


七、CAL:Cybersecurity Assurance Level(Annex E)

CAL ≠ ASIL。CAL 是「保證等級」非「整合等級」,描述開發/驗證的嚴謹度。

CAL 推導 = f(Impact, Attack Vector)
等級:CAL 1 → CAL 2 → CAL 3 → CAL 4 (最嚴格)

13-Annexes-Tools/01-CAL-Cybersecurity-Assurance-Level


八、Cybersecurity Concept 四要素

Item Definition
   ↓
Cybersecurity Goals (對應 Threat Scenario)
   ↓
Cybersecurity Claims (含 Assumed-out-of-scope)
   ↓
Cybersecurity Concept (功能性 + 約束)

06-Concept-Phase/04-Cybersecurity-Concept


九、Work Products 速記(高頻考點)

Work Product 哪個階段 中文
Organizational cybersecurity policies Clause 5 組織資安政策
Cybersecurity Plan Clause 6 資安計畫 ⭐
Cybersecurity Case Clause 6 資安案例 ⭐
Cybersecurity Assessment Report Clause 6 資安評估報告
CIA (Cybersecurity Interface Agreement) Clause 7 資安界面協議 ⭐
TARA Report Clause 15 TARA 報告 ⭐
Cybersecurity Goals / Claims / Concept Clause 9 概念階段三件套
Validation Report Clause 11 驗證報告
Incident Response Plan Clause 13 事件回應計畫

⭐ = 高頻考題

03-Project-Dependent/01-Cybersecurity-Plan03-Project-Dependent/06-Case-and-Assessment


十、與 UN R155 / R156 / ISO 26262 對照

對應主題 ISO 21434 UN R155 ISO 26262
管理系統 Clause 5 (CSMS) §7.2 CSMS Part 2
風險評估 Clause 15 TARA Annex 5 (威脅清單) Part 3 HARA
概念設計 Clause 9 Part 3
產品開發 Clause 10 §7.3 Part 4–6
驗證 Clause 11 §7.3 Part 4
生產 Clause 12 Part 7
營運 Clause 13 §7.4 Part 7
EoS / 除役 Clause 14
軟體更新 UN R156

01-Foundations/05-Regulatory-Landscape13-Annexes-Tools/02-Mapping-to-UN-R155


十一、常用縮寫

縮寫 全名
CSMS Cybersecurity Management System
CS Cybersecurity
CIA Cybersecurity Interface Agreement
TARA Threat Analysis and Risk Assessment
CAL Cybersecurity Assurance Level
SFOP Safety / Financial / Operational / Privacy
OTS Off-the-Shelf
EoS End of Cybersecurity Support
VAS Vulnerability Assessment Statement
WP Work Product
RFQ Request For Quotation

01-Foundations/02-Key-Terms-Definitions